Radiology Search - The Right Place for Searching Radiology Information ... A Radiology search engine developed for Radiologists by Radiologists ...
...the most exciting new development in modernized patient care...(read more)
Search Radiology contents from thousands of peer reviewed Radiology websites and hundreds of Radiology journals!



Include: Semantic search :: Video search :: Quick image search
My Search :: About :: What's new :: Forum :: Online Tutorial :: Feedback :: Contact Us :: Home


Bookmark and Share

Published: . Dec 2014


Pickhardt PJ, Bakke J, Kuo J, Robbins JB, Lubner MG, del AM, Rio DH, Kim

Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series.
(AJR Am J Roentgenol)

The purpose of this study was to compare total colonic gas volume and segmental luminal distention according to patient position on CT colonography (CTC), as well as to determine which two views should constitute the routine protocol. Volumetric analysis was retrospectively performed on CTC examinations from 146 adults (mean age, 59.2 years; 81 men and 65 women; mean body mass index [BMI], 30.9) for whom supine, prone, and right lateral decubitus series were sequentially obtained using continuous low-pressure CO2 insufflation. Total colonic gas volumes were assessed using a novel automated volumetric tool. In addition, two radiologists scored distention by segment using a 4-point scale (4=optimal; 3=adequate; 2=inadequate; 1=collapsed). Mean (┬▒SD) colonic gas volumes for supine, prone, and decubitus positioning were 1617┬▒567, 1441┬▒505, and 1901┬▒627, respectively (p<0.001). Colonic volume was highest on the right lateral decubitus series in 73.3% (107/146) and lowest in 6.2% (9/146) of cases, whereas the prone series was highest in 0.7% (1/146) and lowest in 73.3% (107/146) of cases. Overall mean segmental reader scores and percentages of inadequate or collapsed for supine, prone, and decubitus positions were 3.48, 3.33, and 3.71 and 10.4%, 12.1%, and 4.2%, respectively (p<0.001). The only mean segmental scores below 3.0 were the sigmoid colon on supine (2.68) and prone (2.58) series, compared with 3.23 on decubitus series (p<0.001). Improvement in distention in both decubitus and supine positions over the prone position increased further with increasing BMI (p<0.001). The right lateral decubitus position consistently yields the best colonic distention at CTC and significantly improves evaluation of the sigmoid colon. Prone distention was the worst, particularly as BMI increased. Routine supine and decubitus positioning should be considered for standard CTC protocols, particularly in obese individuals. Automated volumetric analysis provides for rapid objective assessment of colonic distention.

-> Read fulltext

Read more articles from the authors:
1. Pickhardt PJ
2. Bakke J
3. Kuo J
4. Robbins JB
5. Lubner MG
6. del AM
7. Rio DH
8. Kim


Related articles

Read abstract in PubMed

Do search in PubMed

Copy citation:

Export to Bibtex
Export to EndNote
Export to Reference Manager



Bookmark and Share

Add to Yahoo    Add to Del.icio.us    Add to Google    Add to AOL    Add to Furl    Add to Connotea    Add to Citeulike    Add to Stumbleupon    Add to Dissect medicine    Add to 2collab   

Add Radiology Search to your search engines :: Put Radiology Search on your website :: Make Radiology Search your homepage :: Add Radiology Search to your favorites
© 2017 Radiology Search