Radiology Search - The Right Place for Searching Radiology Information ... A Radiology search engine developed for Radiologists by Radiologists ...
...the most exciting new development in modernized patient care...(read more)
Search Radiology contents from thousands of peer reviewed Radiology websites and hundreds of Radiology journals!



Include: Semantic search :: Video search :: Quick image search
My Search :: About :: What's new :: Forum :: Online Tutorial :: Feedback :: Contact Us :: Home


Bookmark and Share

Published: . Dec 2014


Sutter R, Tresch F, Buck FM, Pfirrmann CW

Is dedicated extremity 1.5-T MRI equivalent to standard large-bore 1.5-T MRI for foot and knee examinations?
(AJR Am J Roentgenol)

The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare dedicated extremity MRI and standard large-bore MRI of the lower extremities in the same patients. Sixty-nine patients (27 feet and 42 knees) were examined both with extremity 1.5-T MRI and standard 1.5-T MRI. Scanning duration was measured, and patients completed a detailed questionnaire after each examination (4-point scale). Two readers assessed image quality parameters. Data were analyzed with the paired Student t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and chi-square test. Scanning duration was significantly longer for extremity MRI (foot, 29.9±5.5 minutes; knee, 30.4±5.6 minutes) than for standard MRI (foot, 21.9±5.0 minutes; knee, 20.5±3.9 minutes) (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Acoustic noise reported by the patient was significantly lower on extremity MRI (foot, 1.9±0.9; knee, 2.1±0.7) compared with standard MRI (foot, 2.9±1.0; knee, 2.9±0.8) (p<0.001 for all). Patient satisfaction for both systems was high (1.4-1.6 for all, p=0.2-1.0). Image quality and fat suppression were equally good for both scanners for foot examinations (p≥0.48). Knee examinations generally featured good image quality on both systems, but standard MRI had superior image quality (p≤0.01) and fat suppression (p≤0.001) compared with extremity MRI. More motion artifacts were present on extremity MRI than on standard MRI, which was significant for the knee (p≤0.04) but not for the foot (p≥0.32). Extremity MRI featured less acoustic noise than standard MRI, but examination duration was longer on extremity MRI. Patient satisfaction was high for both scanners. For foot examinations, image quality on extremity MRI was equivalent to standard MRI. Image quality for knee examinations was better on standard MRI compared with extremity MRI, but overall it was good on both systems.

-> Read fulltext

Read more articles from the authors:
1. Sutter R
2. Tresch F
3. Buck FM
4. Pfirrmann CW


Related articles

Read abstract in PubMed

Do search in PubMed

Copy citation:

Export to Bibtex
Export to EndNote
Export to Reference Manager



Bookmark and Share

Add to Yahoo    Add to Del.icio.us    Add to Google    Add to AOL    Add to Furl    Add to Connotea    Add to Citeulike    Add to Stumbleupon    Add to Dissect medicine    Add to 2collab   

Add Radiology Search to your search engines :: Put Radiology Search on your website :: Make Radiology Search your homepage :: Add Radiology Search to your favorites
© 2017 Radiology Search